百家乐怎么玩-澳门百家乐官网娱乐城网址_网上百家乐是不是真的_全讯网888 (中国)·官方网站

Launch of Pro-Chancellor’s Seminar Series

 

group photo
The Pro-Chancellor’s Seminar Series was launched on 10 November. Dr Chung Shui-ming (centre) and Professor Richard Walker (6th from right) took photo with the CityU members.

 

In the inaugural talk in the Pro-Chancellor’s Seminar Series, Professor Richard Walker, Chan Hon Pun Professor of Behavioural and Policy Sciences and Dean of the College of Liberal Arts and Social Sciences at City University of Hong Kong (City U), delved into the intricate world of university rankings, offering insights into their implications for higher education from a public-management perspective.

Dr Chung Shui-ming
Dr Chung Shui-ming

 

Launching the seminar series on 10 November, Dr Chung Shui-ming, Pro-Chancellor of CityU, said that the aim of this new initiative is to bring together distinguished academics and professionals to share their insights on cutting-edge developments in diverse fields. “The series embodies CityU’s commitment to, and relentless pursuit of, excellence and knowledge for the well-being and advancement of society and the region,” said Dr Chung.

Professor Walker began his talk with a thought-provoking question: “What drives our behaviour? Is it the ranking system, or our fundamental beliefs and values as academics and an academic institution?”

He traced the origins of university rankings back to the late 1800s, highlighting their growing significance over time. The rankings not only influence public perceptions, but also play a crucial role in shaping the strategies and priorities of universities worldwide.

From a public-management perspective, Professor Walker explored the notion of public organisations, like universities, having multiple and often conflicting goals, leading to goal ambiguity and challenges in performance management. “Performance metrics drive our behaviour. What is measured gets done,” said Professor Walker.

Professor Richard Walker
Professor Richard Walker

 

However, while rankings drive certain behaviours, they may not always be aligned with the fundamental values and goals of academic institutions.

To illustrate this point, Professor Walker examined the criteria used in major university rankings, like QS, Times Higher Education, and Academic Ranking of World Universities, noting that while they have evolved to include more diverse metrics, there remain gaps and biases. One example is that they often fail to capture the full spectrum of university goals, such as diversity and inclusion, sustainability and community engagement.

Professor Walker concluded by reminding the audience that ranking is a reductionist approach, which does not adequately capture the complexity of education and knowledge creation. But “rankings are institutionalised,” he said. “We are not getting rid of them. The question is whether we can maintain a balance between the adherence to rankings and pursuing our ‘quest for truth’.”

Professor Walker’s speech inspired an enthusiastic response from the audience, with some noting the evolution of research excellence assessment indices. While acknowledging the advances in the assessment system and the integration of new metrics, Professor Walker raised an important question: Are these changes in assessment criteria driven by the academic community or by the private ranking organisations? He highlighted the challenge of maintaining a balance between striving for higher rankings and upholding the core goals of the university.

 

YOU MAY BE INTERESTED

Contact Information

Communications and Institutional Research Office

Back to top
在线玩百家乐的玩法技巧和规则| A8百家乐官网游戏| 澳门百家乐官网才能| 百家乐官网庄家抽水| 南安市| 十六蒲娱乐城| 威尼斯人娱乐城官方| 微信百家乐群资源| 威尼斯人娱乐城澳门赌场| 威尼斯人娱乐城网站| 全讯网123| 贵宾百家乐的玩法技巧和规则| 百家乐网上真钱娱乐网| 总格24画的名字好吗| 百家乐官网网址多少| 百家乐下注技巧| 威尼斯人娱乐骰宝| 香港六合彩码报| bet365主页器| 博彩吧| 威尼斯人娱乐官方| tt娱乐城开户| 银河国际娱乐城| 博客国际娱乐| 足球直播| 天空娱乐城| 百家乐官网娱乐城送分| 霍州市| 百家乐官网代理加盟| 百家乐官网赢赌场百家乐官网| 真人百家乐官网平台排行| 百家乐官网娱乐求指点呀| 克拉克百家乐官网的玩法技巧和规则 | 大发888官方网站下载| 大发888大发888娱乐城| 银川市| 百家乐官网注册平台排名| 百家乐官网平注法规则| 网上百家乐赌| 德州扑克 大小| 百家乐官网赌博代理合作|