百家乐怎么玩-澳门百家乐官网娱乐城网址_网上百家乐是不是真的_全讯网888 (中国)·官方网站

 

Research method (2006-2007 & 2007-2008)

Research Procedure

To evaluate the effectiveness of the child group intervention, this project adopted a scientific research procedure.

 

 

1. Screening

The high-risk reactive aggressors and proactive aggressors were screened out according to the questionnaire results as follows.
  1. The students, whose scores on the Child Behaviour Checklist – Youth Self-Report: Aggressive Behaviour Subscale were equal to or higher than their clinical score were categorised as aggressors;
  2. Then, according to their scores on the Reactive and Proactive Aggression Questionnaire, these aggressors were further categorised as high-risk reactive aggressors or proactive aggressors.
The high-risk aggressive victims and passive victims were screened out according to the questionnaire results as follows.
  1. 1. The students who received high scores on the Peer Victimisation Questionnaire were categorised as victims.
  2. 2. Then, according to the scores on the Reactive and Proactive Aggression Questionnaire, Child Behaviour Checklist - Youth Self-Report: Anxious/Depressed Subscale, and Child Behaviour Checklist - Youth Self-Report: Aggressive Behaviour Subscale, these victims were further categorised as high-risk aggressive victims or passive victims.
Subtypes of Aggressors and Victims Child Behavior Checklist - Youth Self-Report Reactive and Proactive Aggression Questionnaire Peer Victimization Questionnaire
Reactive Aggressors Aggressive Behaviour Subscale: Higher than the clinical score Score on Reactive Aggression Subscale was higher than that on Proactive Aggression Subscale N/A
Proactive Aggressors Aggressive Behaviour Subscale: Higher than the clinical score Score on Proactive Aggression Subscale was higher than that on Reactive Aggression Subscale N/A
Aggressive Victims Anxious/Depressed Subscale: Higher than the clinical score Score on Reactive Aggression Subscale was higher than that on Proactive Aggression Subscale Equal to/higher than the clinical score*

Passive Victims

Aggressive Behaviour Subscale: Below the clinical score N/A Equal to/higher than the clinical score*

 

2. Pre-test

a. Students

After the screening, all of the selected students and their parents and teachers were invited to attend the pre-test. The teachers were also allowed to recommend the aggressors, victims and control students they thought should participate in the pre-test. Individual interviews were assigned to the selected students to gain a better understanding of their cognitive structure and mode of thinking.

b. Teachers

Four teachers familiar with the selected students and their thoughts, behaviours and emotions were invited to participate in the pre-test. Due to limited resources, only one teacher in four was asked to complete both the pre-test interview and the questionnaires. The other teachers were only asked to complete the pre-test questionnaires.

c. Parents

At least one parent of each child in the group intervention was invited to complete the pre-test questionnaires and participate in a pre-test interview to collect more information on the student’s performance at home.

3. Intervention groups and control groups

Based on the results of the screening and pre-test questionnaires, high-risk students were classified into four subtypes: reactive aggressors, proactive aggressors, aggressive victims and passive victims. These high-risk students were randomly assigned to an intervention group or control group, with each intervention group having one control student.

4. Post-test

a. Students

Members of both the intervention groups and control groups were asked to complete the post-test questionnaires and individual interviews within one month after the final session of the group intervention. They were then asked to complete follow-up test questionnaires and individual interviews three months after the group intervention. The aim was to assess the group members’ situations after they completed the group intervention.

b. Teachers

Teachers were required to observe the students’ thoughts, behaviours and emotions during the group intervention to obtain an accurate evaluation of the students. Similar to the pre-test, four teachers were asked to take the post-test and one of them was asked to complete both the post-test questionnaires and the interviews. The others were only asked to complete the post-test questionnaires.

c. Parents

After the group intervention, at least one parent of a group member was invited to complete the post-test questionnaires and interview.

Back to Top

Assessment Tools for Students, Teachers and Parents

I. Reactive Aggressors (06-07)

  Screening Questionnaire Pre-test Post-test three-month/oneyear/ two-year follow-up
Students
  • Reactive and Proactive Aggression Questionnaire
  • Child Behavior Checklist – Youth Self-Report
  • Peer Victimization Questionnaire
  • Anger Self-Report
  • Child Behavior Checklist – Youth Self-Report
  • Reactive and Proactive Aggression Questionnaire
  • Anger Self-Report
  • Child Behavior Checklist – Youth Self-Report
  • Reactive and Proactive Aggression Questionnaire
  • Anger Self-Report
Teachers
  • N/A
  • Child Behavior Checklist – Teacher Report Form
  • Reactive and Proactive Aggression Questionnaire – Teacher Rating Scale
  • Child Behavior Checklist – Teacher Report Form
  • Reactive and Proactive Aggression Questionnaire – Teacher Rating Scale
  • N/A
Parents
  • N/A
  • Child Behavior Checklist-Parent Version
  • Antisocial Process Screening Device
  • Conflict Tactics Scale
  • Child Behavior Checklist-Parent Version
  • Antisocial Process Screening Device
  • Conflict Tactics Scale
  • N/A

 

II. Passive Victims (06-07)

  Screening Questionnaire Pre-test Post-test three-month/oneyear/ two-year follow-up
Students
  • Child Behavior Checklist - Youth Self -Report
  • Reactive and Proactive Aggression Questionnaire
  • Peer Victimization Questionnaire
  • N/A
  • Child Behavior Checklist - Youth Self -Report
  • Peer Victimization Questionnaire
  • Child Behavior Checklist - Youth Self -Report
  • Peer Victimization Questionnaire
Teachers
  • N/A
  • Child Behavior Checklist – Teacher Report Form
  • Peer Victimization Questionnaire-Teacher Rating Scale
  • Child Behavior Checklist – Teacher Report Form
  • Peer Victimization Questionnaire-Teacher Rating Scale
  • N/A
Parents
  • N/A
  • Child Behavior Checklist-Parent Version
  • Antisocial Process Screening Device
  • Conflict Tactics Scale
  • Child Behavior Checklist-Parent Version
  • Antisocial Process Screening Device
  • Conflict Tactics Scale
  • N/A

 

III. Proactive Aggressors (07-08)

  Screening Questionnaire Pre-test Post-test three-month/oneyear/ two-year follow-up
Students
  • Child Behavior Checklist - Youth Self -Report
  • Reactive and Proactive Aggression Questionnaire
  • Peer Victimization Questionnaire
  • Aggression Questionnaire
  • Relational Aggression Measure
  • Interpersonal Reactivity Index
  • Child Behavior Checklist - Youth Self -Report
  • Reactive and Proactive Aggression Questionnaire
  • Aggression Questionnaire
  • Relational Aggression Measure
  • Interpersonal Reactivity Index
  • Child Behavior Checklist - Youth Self -Report
  • Reactive and Proactive Aggression Questionnaire
  • Aggression Questionnaire
  • Relational Aggression Measure
  • Interpersonal Reactivity Index
Teachers
  • N/A
  • Child Behavior Checklist – Teacher Report Form
  • Reactive and Proactive Aggression Questionnaire-Teacher Rating Scale
  • Child Behavior Checklist – Teacher Report Form
  • Reactive and Proactive Aggression Questionnaire-Teacher Rating Scale
  • N/A
Parents
  • N/A
  • Child Behavior Checklist-Parent Version
  • Antisocial Process Screening Device
  • Reactive and Proactive Aggression Questionnaire - Parent Rating Scale
  • Self-Efficacy for Parent Tasks Index
  • Child Disclosure
  • Child Behavior Checklist-Parent Version
  • Antisocial Process Screening Device
  • Reactive and Proactive Aggression Questionnaire - Parent Rating Scale
  • Self-Efficacy for Parent Tasks Index
  • Child Disclosure
  • N/A

 

IV. Aggressive Victims (07-08)

  Screening Questionnaire Pre-test Post-test three-month/oneyear/ two-year follow-up
Students
  • Child Behavior Checklist - Youth Self -Report
  • Reactive and Proactive Aggression Questionnaire
  • Peer Victimization Questionnaire
  • Child Behavior Checklist - Youth Self -Report
  • Reactive and Proactive Aggression Questionnaire
  • Peer Victimization Questionnaire
  • State-Trait Anger Expression Inventory
  • School Psychosocial Climate Scale
  • Child Behavior Checklist - Youth Self -Report
  • Reactive and Proactive Aggression Questionnaire
  • Peer Victimization Questionnaire
  • State-Trait Anger Expression Inventory
  • School Psychosocial Climate Scale
  • Child Behavior Checklist - Youth Self -Report
  • Reactive and Proactive Aggression Questionnaire
  • Peer Victimization Questionnaire
  • State-Trait Anger Expression Inventory
  • School Psychosocial Climate Scale
Teachers
  • N/A
  • Child Behavior Checklist – Teacher Report Form
  • Reactive and Proactive Aggression Questionnaire-Teacher Rating Scale
  • Peer Victimization Questionnaire-Teacher Rating Scale
  • Child Behavior Checklist – Teacher Report Form
  • Reactive and Proactive Aggression Questionnaire-Teacher Rating Scale
  • Peer Victimization Questionnaire-Teacher Rating Scale
  • N/A
Parents
  • N/A
  • Child Behavior Checklist-Parent Version
  • Antisocial Process Screening Device
  • Reactive and Proactive Aggression Questionnaire - Parent Rating Scale
  • Self-Efficacy for Parent Tasks Index
  • Child Disclosure
  • General Peer Problem Scale
  • Conners' Parent Rating Scale - Revised(S)
  • Child Behavior Checklist-Parent Version
  • Antisocial Process Screening Device
  • Reactive and Proactive Aggression Questionnaire - Parent Rating Scale
  • Self-Efficacy for Parent Tasks Index
  • Child Disclosure
  • General Peer Problem Scale
  • Conners' Parent Rating Scale - Revised(S)
  • N/A

Back to Top

© 2019 City University of Hong Kong          Project on Children and Adolescents at Risk Education (Project C.A.R.E.)
威尼斯人娱乐城首存| 大发888娱乐免费试玩| 百家乐官网证据| 大发888什么赢钱快| 百家乐官网利来| 大发888注册送58元| 风水学24山看水法| 百家乐官网注册就送| 百家乐官网官网网站| 棋牌游戏开发公司| 菲律百家乐太阳城| 川宜百家乐官网分析软件| 威尼斯人娱乐城最新地址| 百家乐官网任你博娱乐场开户注册 | 赌王百家乐的玩法技巧和规则| 百家乐官网赌的是心态吗| 欢乐谷娱乐城开户| 百家乐投注方法多不多| 网上百家乐官网软件大全酷| 澳门博彩官网| 什么是百家乐的大路| 星际百家乐官网娱乐城| 金盛国际| 百家乐桌子黑色| 百苑百家乐官网的玩法技巧和规则 | 百家乐官网真人游戏赌场娱乐网规则| 注册娱乐城送体验金| 噢门百家乐玩法| 百家乐官网平的概率| 最新皇冠网| 澳门档百家乐的玩法技巧和规则 | 百家乐官网策略与心得| 大发888游戏下载官方下载| 博彩百家乐带连线走势图| 多台百家乐官网的玩法技巧和规则| 百家乐官网娱乐城彩金| 大发888体育和娱乐| 赤壁百家乐娱乐城| 百家乐的必胜方法| 百家乐官网新送彩金| 百家乐官网游戏软件开发|