百家乐怎么玩-澳门百家乐官网娱乐城网址_网上百家乐是不是真的_全讯网888 (中国)·官方网站

 

Research method (2006-2007 & 2007-2008)

Research Procedure

To evaluate the effectiveness of the child group intervention, this project adopted a scientific research procedure.

 

 

1. Screening

The high-risk reactive aggressors and proactive aggressors were screened out according to the questionnaire results as follows.
  1. The students, whose scores on the Child Behaviour Checklist – Youth Self-Report: Aggressive Behaviour Subscale were equal to or higher than their clinical score were categorised as aggressors;
  2. Then, according to their scores on the Reactive and Proactive Aggression Questionnaire, these aggressors were further categorised as high-risk reactive aggressors or proactive aggressors.
The high-risk aggressive victims and passive victims were screened out according to the questionnaire results as follows.
  1. 1. The students who received high scores on the Peer Victimisation Questionnaire were categorised as victims.
  2. 2. Then, according to the scores on the Reactive and Proactive Aggression Questionnaire, Child Behaviour Checklist - Youth Self-Report: Anxious/Depressed Subscale, and Child Behaviour Checklist - Youth Self-Report: Aggressive Behaviour Subscale, these victims were further categorised as high-risk aggressive victims or passive victims.
Subtypes of Aggressors and Victims Child Behavior Checklist - Youth Self-Report Reactive and Proactive Aggression Questionnaire Peer Victimization Questionnaire
Reactive Aggressors Aggressive Behaviour Subscale: Higher than the clinical score Score on Reactive Aggression Subscale was higher than that on Proactive Aggression Subscale N/A
Proactive Aggressors Aggressive Behaviour Subscale: Higher than the clinical score Score on Proactive Aggression Subscale was higher than that on Reactive Aggression Subscale N/A
Aggressive Victims Anxious/Depressed Subscale: Higher than the clinical score Score on Reactive Aggression Subscale was higher than that on Proactive Aggression Subscale Equal to/higher than the clinical score*

Passive Victims

Aggressive Behaviour Subscale: Below the clinical score N/A Equal to/higher than the clinical score*

 

2. Pre-test

a. Students

After the screening, all of the selected students and their parents and teachers were invited to attend the pre-test. The teachers were also allowed to recommend the aggressors, victims and control students they thought should participate in the pre-test. Individual interviews were assigned to the selected students to gain a better understanding of their cognitive structure and mode of thinking.

b. Teachers

Four teachers familiar with the selected students and their thoughts, behaviours and emotions were invited to participate in the pre-test. Due to limited resources, only one teacher in four was asked to complete both the pre-test interview and the questionnaires. The other teachers were only asked to complete the pre-test questionnaires.

c. Parents

At least one parent of each child in the group intervention was invited to complete the pre-test questionnaires and participate in a pre-test interview to collect more information on the student’s performance at home.

3. Intervention groups and control groups

Based on the results of the screening and pre-test questionnaires, high-risk students were classified into four subtypes: reactive aggressors, proactive aggressors, aggressive victims and passive victims. These high-risk students were randomly assigned to an intervention group or control group, with each intervention group having one control student.

4. Post-test

a. Students

Members of both the intervention groups and control groups were asked to complete the post-test questionnaires and individual interviews within one month after the final session of the group intervention. They were then asked to complete follow-up test questionnaires and individual interviews three months after the group intervention. The aim was to assess the group members’ situations after they completed the group intervention.

b. Teachers

Teachers were required to observe the students’ thoughts, behaviours and emotions during the group intervention to obtain an accurate evaluation of the students. Similar to the pre-test, four teachers were asked to take the post-test and one of them was asked to complete both the post-test questionnaires and the interviews. The others were only asked to complete the post-test questionnaires.

c. Parents

After the group intervention, at least one parent of a group member was invited to complete the post-test questionnaires and interview.

Back to Top

Assessment Tools for Students, Teachers and Parents

I. Reactive Aggressors (06-07)

  Screening Questionnaire Pre-test Post-test three-month/oneyear/ two-year follow-up
Students
  • Reactive and Proactive Aggression Questionnaire
  • Child Behavior Checklist – Youth Self-Report
  • Peer Victimization Questionnaire
  • Anger Self-Report
  • Child Behavior Checklist – Youth Self-Report
  • Reactive and Proactive Aggression Questionnaire
  • Anger Self-Report
  • Child Behavior Checklist – Youth Self-Report
  • Reactive and Proactive Aggression Questionnaire
  • Anger Self-Report
Teachers
  • N/A
  • Child Behavior Checklist – Teacher Report Form
  • Reactive and Proactive Aggression Questionnaire – Teacher Rating Scale
  • Child Behavior Checklist – Teacher Report Form
  • Reactive and Proactive Aggression Questionnaire – Teacher Rating Scale
  • N/A
Parents
  • N/A
  • Child Behavior Checklist-Parent Version
  • Antisocial Process Screening Device
  • Conflict Tactics Scale
  • Child Behavior Checklist-Parent Version
  • Antisocial Process Screening Device
  • Conflict Tactics Scale
  • N/A

 

II. Passive Victims (06-07)

  Screening Questionnaire Pre-test Post-test three-month/oneyear/ two-year follow-up
Students
  • Child Behavior Checklist - Youth Self -Report
  • Reactive and Proactive Aggression Questionnaire
  • Peer Victimization Questionnaire
  • N/A
  • Child Behavior Checklist - Youth Self -Report
  • Peer Victimization Questionnaire
  • Child Behavior Checklist - Youth Self -Report
  • Peer Victimization Questionnaire
Teachers
  • N/A
  • Child Behavior Checklist – Teacher Report Form
  • Peer Victimization Questionnaire-Teacher Rating Scale
  • Child Behavior Checklist – Teacher Report Form
  • Peer Victimization Questionnaire-Teacher Rating Scale
  • N/A
Parents
  • N/A
  • Child Behavior Checklist-Parent Version
  • Antisocial Process Screening Device
  • Conflict Tactics Scale
  • Child Behavior Checklist-Parent Version
  • Antisocial Process Screening Device
  • Conflict Tactics Scale
  • N/A

 

III. Proactive Aggressors (07-08)

  Screening Questionnaire Pre-test Post-test three-month/oneyear/ two-year follow-up
Students
  • Child Behavior Checklist - Youth Self -Report
  • Reactive and Proactive Aggression Questionnaire
  • Peer Victimization Questionnaire
  • Aggression Questionnaire
  • Relational Aggression Measure
  • Interpersonal Reactivity Index
  • Child Behavior Checklist - Youth Self -Report
  • Reactive and Proactive Aggression Questionnaire
  • Aggression Questionnaire
  • Relational Aggression Measure
  • Interpersonal Reactivity Index
  • Child Behavior Checklist - Youth Self -Report
  • Reactive and Proactive Aggression Questionnaire
  • Aggression Questionnaire
  • Relational Aggression Measure
  • Interpersonal Reactivity Index
Teachers
  • N/A
  • Child Behavior Checklist – Teacher Report Form
  • Reactive and Proactive Aggression Questionnaire-Teacher Rating Scale
  • Child Behavior Checklist – Teacher Report Form
  • Reactive and Proactive Aggression Questionnaire-Teacher Rating Scale
  • N/A
Parents
  • N/A
  • Child Behavior Checklist-Parent Version
  • Antisocial Process Screening Device
  • Reactive and Proactive Aggression Questionnaire - Parent Rating Scale
  • Self-Efficacy for Parent Tasks Index
  • Child Disclosure
  • Child Behavior Checklist-Parent Version
  • Antisocial Process Screening Device
  • Reactive and Proactive Aggression Questionnaire - Parent Rating Scale
  • Self-Efficacy for Parent Tasks Index
  • Child Disclosure
  • N/A

 

IV. Aggressive Victims (07-08)

  Screening Questionnaire Pre-test Post-test three-month/oneyear/ two-year follow-up
Students
  • Child Behavior Checklist - Youth Self -Report
  • Reactive and Proactive Aggression Questionnaire
  • Peer Victimization Questionnaire
  • Child Behavior Checklist - Youth Self -Report
  • Reactive and Proactive Aggression Questionnaire
  • Peer Victimization Questionnaire
  • State-Trait Anger Expression Inventory
  • School Psychosocial Climate Scale
  • Child Behavior Checklist - Youth Self -Report
  • Reactive and Proactive Aggression Questionnaire
  • Peer Victimization Questionnaire
  • State-Trait Anger Expression Inventory
  • School Psychosocial Climate Scale
  • Child Behavior Checklist - Youth Self -Report
  • Reactive and Proactive Aggression Questionnaire
  • Peer Victimization Questionnaire
  • State-Trait Anger Expression Inventory
  • School Psychosocial Climate Scale
Teachers
  • N/A
  • Child Behavior Checklist – Teacher Report Form
  • Reactive and Proactive Aggression Questionnaire-Teacher Rating Scale
  • Peer Victimization Questionnaire-Teacher Rating Scale
  • Child Behavior Checklist – Teacher Report Form
  • Reactive and Proactive Aggression Questionnaire-Teacher Rating Scale
  • Peer Victimization Questionnaire-Teacher Rating Scale
  • N/A
Parents
  • N/A
  • Child Behavior Checklist-Parent Version
  • Antisocial Process Screening Device
  • Reactive and Proactive Aggression Questionnaire - Parent Rating Scale
  • Self-Efficacy for Parent Tasks Index
  • Child Disclosure
  • General Peer Problem Scale
  • Conners' Parent Rating Scale - Revised(S)
  • Child Behavior Checklist-Parent Version
  • Antisocial Process Screening Device
  • Reactive and Proactive Aggression Questionnaire - Parent Rating Scale
  • Self-Efficacy for Parent Tasks Index
  • Child Disclosure
  • General Peer Problem Scale
  • Conners' Parent Rating Scale - Revised(S)
  • N/A

Back to Top

© 2019 City University of Hong Kong          Project on Children and Adolescents at Risk Education (Project C.A.R.E.)
百家乐翻天qvod粤语| 大发888赌场娱乐网规则| 线上百家乐网站| 百家乐官网与21点| 累积式百家乐的玩法技巧和规则| 百家乐官网补牌规律| 真钱百家乐五湖四海全讯网| 百色市| 实战百家乐官网的玩法技巧和规则| 真人版百家乐试玩| 网上百家乐官网做假| 百家乐游戏算牌| 永顺县| 百家乐破解之法| 象棋赌博网| 百家乐网站源码| 百家乐官网代理商博彩e族| 百家乐稳赢秘笈| 百家乐官网游戏如何玩| 大世界百家乐的玩法技巧和规则| 百家乐官网好多假网站| 皇家百家乐的玩法技巧和规则| 百家乐官网路单破| bet365手机版| 百家乐规则技法| 赌百家乐官网的下场| 大发888娱乐英皇国际| 免费下百家乐官网赌博软件| 大发888娱乐英皇国际| 百家乐官网电影网| 贵定县| 百家乐高手看百家乐| 百家乐官网咋个玩的| 百家乐套利| 百家乐官网10个人| 百家乐如何取胜| 网上百家乐官网能作弊吗| 大发888娱乐软件| 鑫鼎百家乐官网的玩法技巧和规则 | 百家乐官网要怎么玩啊| 百家乐平一直压庄|